alloc_pages_node is called with cpu_to_node(cpu).
I think cpu_to_node(cpu) never returns -1.
(But I am not sure we need double check.)
So we can use alloc_pages_exact_node instead of alloc_pages_node.
It could avoid comparison and branch as 6484eb3e2a81807722 tried.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/percpu.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 768419d..ec3e671 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static int pcpu_alloc_pages(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
for (i = page_start; i < page_end; i++) {
struct page **pagep = &pages[pcpu_page_idx(cpu, i)];
- *pagep = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu), gfp, 0);
+ *pagep = alloc_pages_exact_node(cpu_to_node(cpu), gfp, 0);
if (!*pagep) {
pcpu_free_pages(chunk, pages, populated,
page_start, page_end);
--
1.7.0.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>