> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 01:59:45PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:40:41 +1000 > > Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > 50) 3168 64 xfs_vm_writepage+0xab/0x160 [xfs] > > > 51) 3104 384 shrink_page_list+0x65e/0x840 > > > 52) 2720 528 shrink_zone+0x63f/0xe10 > > > > A bit OFF TOPIC. > > > > Could you share disassemble of shrink_zone() ? > > > > In my environ. > > 00000000000115a0 <shrink_zone>: > > 115a0: 55 push %rbp > > 115a1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > > 115a4: 41 57 push %r15 > > 115a6: 41 56 push %r14 > > 115a8: 41 55 push %r13 > > 115aa: 41 54 push %r12 > > 115ac: 53 push %rbx > > 115ad: 48 83 ec 78 sub $0x78,%rsp > > 115b1: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 115b6 <shrink_zone+0x16> > > 115b6: 48 89 75 80 mov %rsi,-0x80(%rbp) > > > > disassemble seems to show 0x78 bytes for stack. And no changes to %rsp > > until retrun. > > I see the same. I didn't compile those kernels, though. IIUC, > they were built through the Ubuntu build infrastructure, so there is > something different in terms of compiler, compiler options or config > to what we are both using. Most likely it is the compiler inlining, > though Chris's patches to prevent that didn't seem to change the > stack usage. > > I'm trying to get a stack trace from the kernel that has shrink_zone > in it, but I haven't succeeded yet.... I also got 0x78 byte stack usage. Umm.. Do we discussed real issue now? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>