Re: [PATCH 00 of 41] Transparent Hugepage Support #17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:55:43PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> That already happens.

Yep as shown by /proc/pagetypeinfo.

> True. Christoph made a few stabs at being able to slab targetted reclaim
> (called defragmentation, but it was about reclaim) but it was never completed
> and merged. Even if it was merged, the slab reclaimable objects would
> still be kept in their own 2M pageblocks though.

I guess it's not easy and more expensive to reclaim in use object, I
didn't see the targetted reclaim patches. So it sounds ok if they stay
in their own pageblocks separated from the movable pageblocks, even if
they become fully reclaimable.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]