On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Especially when you use something like SLUB as the memory allocator > > which requires higher order allocations for objects which are pinned > > in kernel memory. > > I guess we'd need to merge the SLUB defragmentation patches to fix that? 1. SLUB does not require higher order allocations. 2. SLUB defrag patches would allow reclaim / moving of slab memory but would require callbacks to be provided by slab users to remove references to objects. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>