On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:48:42PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:58:47PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:56:04PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > Humm, maybe the start pfn could be huge page aligned? That would make > > > it possible to check for PageTransHuge() and skip over compound_order() > > > pages. This way, we should never actually run into PG_tail pages. > > > > The problem here are random compound pages that aren't owned by the > > transparent hugepage subsystem. If we can't identify those, it's > > unsafe to call compound_order (like it's unsafe to call page_order for > > pagebuddy pages). > > But transparent huge pages are the only compound pages on the LRU, so > we should be able to identify them. > > The lru_lock excludes isolation, splitting and collapsing, so I think > this is safe: > > if (PageLRU() && PageTransCompound()) { > low_pfn += (1 << compound_order()) - 1 > continue > } > > if (__isolate_lru_page()) > continue > > ... I don't see anything wrong with this. You're right lru_lock excludes isolation, splitting and collapsing (collapsing if it's pagelru it means it already happened). Thanks for thinking this optimization in detail. I guess retaining the other optimization will be harder. It depends how costly it is to take the zone->lock, the main annoyance is that we can only do that if we release the lru_lock first or we get lock inversion deadlocks. So it costs 4 locked ops to skip max 1024 pages (but in average it'll be much less than 1024 pages, more like 128 [no math just random guess] when there's quite some ram free). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>