Re: Downsides to madvise/fadvise(willneed) for application startup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Minchan,

> A few month ago, I saw your patch about enhancing readahead.
> At that time, many guys tested several size of USB and SSD which are
> consist of nand device.
> The result is good if we does readahead untile some crossover point.
> So I think we need readahead about file I/O in non-rotation device, too.
> 
> But startup latency is important than file I/O performance in some machine.
> With analysis at that time, code readahead of application affected slow startup.
> In addition, during bootup, cache hit ratio was very small.
> 
> So I hoped we can disable readahead just only code section(ie, roughly
> exec vma's filemap fault). :)
> 
> I don't want you to solve this problem right now.
> Just let you understand embedded system's some problem
> for enhancing readahead in future.  :)

Yeah, I've never heard of such a demand, definitely good to know it!

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]