On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In funtion migrate_pages(), if the dest node have no
> enough free pages,it will fallback to other nodes.
> Add GFP_THISNODE to avoid this, the same as what
> funtion new_page_node() do in migrate.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx>
Yes. It can be fixed. but I have a different concern.
I looked at 6484eb3e2a81807722c5f28ef.
" page allocator: do not check NUMA node ID when the caller knows
the node is valid
Callers of alloc_pages_node() can optionally specify -1 as a node to mean
"allocate from the current node". However, a number of the callers in
fast paths know for a fact their node is valid. To avoid a comparison and
branch, this patch adds alloc_pages_exact_node() that only checks the nid
with VM_BUG_ON(). Callers that know their node is valid are then
converted."
alloc_pages_exact_node's naming would be not good.
It is not for allocate page from exact node but just for
removing check of node's valid.
Some people like me who is poor english could misunderstood it.
How about changing name with following?
/* This function can allocate page to fallback list of node*/
alloc_pages_by_nodeid(...)
And instead of it, let's change alloc_pages_exact_node with following.
static inline struct page *alloc_pages_exact_node(...)
{
VM_BUG_ON ..
return __alloc_pages(gfp_mask|__GFP_THISNODE...);
}
I think it's more clear than old.
What do you think about it?
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>