On 04/02/2010 05:13 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
Yeah, I don't want ignore .33-stable too. if I can't find the root cause
in 2-3 days, I'll revert guilty patch anyway.
It's a good idea to avoid fixing a bug one-way-in-stable,
other-way-in-mainline. Because then we have new code in both trees
which is different. And the -stable guys sensibly like to see code get
a bit of a shakedown in mainline before backporting it.
So it would be better to merge the "simple" patch into mainline, tagged
for -stable backporting. Then we can later implement the larger fix in
mainline, perhaps starting by reverting the "simple" fix.
.....ok. I don't have to prevent your code maintainship. although I still
think we need to fix the issue completely.
Agreed on the revert.
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>