Re: [PATCH 00 of 41] Transparent Hugepage Support #17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 01:32:21PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > 
> > AFAIK, most modern GCs split memory in young and old generation
> > "zones" and _copy_ surviving objects from the former to the latter if
> > their lifetime exceeds some threshold. The JVM keeps scanning the
> > smaller young generation very aggressively which causes TLB pressure
> > and scans the larger old generation less often.
> 
> .. my only input to this is: numbers talk, bullsh*t walks. 
> 
> I'm not interested in micro-benchmarks, either. I can show infinite TLB 
> walk improvement in a microbenchmark.

Ok, I'll bite.  I should be able to get some database workloads with
hugepages, transparent hugepages, and without any hugepages at all.

-chris

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]