On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:21:41 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:13:16AM +0900, Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:00:37 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Add hugepage stat information to /proc/vmstat and /proc/meminfo. > > > > > I'm sorry if it has been discussed already, but shouldn't we also count > > LRU_(IN)ACTIVE_LRU properly ? Is it a TODO ? > typo of LRU_(IN)ACTIVE_ANON of course ;) > Maybe we should it's not huge priority at the moment, it still tells > accurately the number of entries in the list, it's not like garbled > information but it doesn't reflect strict memory size anymore. It > reflects the size of the list instead (only with transparent hugepage > support enabled otherwise the exact old behavior is retained). I'm > unsure how big issue is that. Hmm, "the size of the lists" might be enough for vmscan calculation, (but, sorry, I'm not a vmscan expert). But "Active/Inactive(anon)" in /proc/meminfo would become inaccurate. Yes, it might not be a big deal(it doesn't cause panic), but I think we should let users know about it by a documentation or something. Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>