Re: [PATCH 36 of 41] remove PG_buddy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 20:49 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 20:37 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > PG_buddy can be converted to page->_count == -1. So the PG_compound_lock can be
> > added to page->flags without overflowing (because of the section bits
> > increasing) with CONFIG_X86_PAE=y.
> 
> This seems to break the assumption that all free pages have a zero page
> count relied upon by things like page_cache_get_speculative().
> 
> What if a page-cache pages gets freed and used as a head in the buddy
> list while a concurrent lockless page-cache lookup tries to get a page
> ref?

And here goes me wanting to hijack it for PG_arch_2 :-)

Is there any other page flag we could hijack ? I need it only when the
page is allocated, so a flag that's only used when the page sits in the
buddy would be fine.

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]