On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Lee's patch "mempolicy: use MPOL_PREFERRED for system-wide
> default policy" has made the MPOL_DEFAULT only used in the
> memory policy APIs. So, no need to check in __mpol_equal also.
> Also get rid of mpol_match_intent() and move its logic directly
> into __mpol_equal().
>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/mempolicy.c | 16 +++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index b88e914..17df048 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1787,16 +1787,6 @@ struct mempolicy *__mpol_cond_copy(struct mempolicy *tompol,
> return tompol;
> }
>
> -static int mpol_match_intent(const struct mempolicy *a,
> - const struct mempolicy *b)
> -{
> - if (a->flags != b->flags)
> - return 0;
> - if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(a))
> - return 1;
> - return nodes_equal(a->w.user_nodemask, b->w.user_nodemask);
> -}
> -
> /* Slow path of a mempolicy comparison */
> int __mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, struct mempolicy *b)
> {
> @@ -1804,7 +1794,11 @@ int __mpol_equal(struct mempolicy *a, struct mempolicy *b)
> return 0;
> if (a->mode != b->mode)
> return 0;
> - if (a->mode != MPOL_DEFAULT && !mpol_match_intent(a, b))
> + if (a->flags != b->flags)
> + return 0;
> + if (mpol_store_user_nodemask(a))
> + return 0;
> + if (!nodes_equal(a->w.user_nodemask, b->w.user_nodemask))
> return 0;
> switch (a->mode) {
> case MPOL_BIND:
This patch is uncorrect, I have resend a new one :-)
> --
> 1.5.6.3
>
>
--
Regards,
-Bob Liu
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href