On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Mel Gorman wrote: > This is true, but I don't think such a change belongs in this patch > series. If this series gets merged, then it would be sensible to investigate > if refcounting anon_vma is a good idea or would it be a bouncing write-shared > cacheline mess. SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU is there to avoid the cooling of hot cachelines by RCU. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>