Hi, Mel.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> rmap_walk_anon() was triggering errors in memory compaction that looks like
> use-after-free errors in anon_vma. The problem appears to be that between
> the page being isolated from the LRU and rcu_read_lock() being taken, the
> mapcount of the page dropped to 0 and the anon_vma was freed. This patch
> skips the migration of anon pages that are not mapped by anyone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/migrate.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 98eaaf2..3c491e3 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -602,6 +602,16 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private,
> * just care Anon page here.
> */
> if (PageAnon(page)) {
> + /*
> + * If the page has no mappings any more, just bail. An
> + * unmapped anon page is likely to be freed soon but worse,
> + * it's possible its anon_vma disappeared between when
> + * the page was isolated and when we reached here while
> + * the RCU lock was not held
> + */
> + if (!page_mapcount(page))
As looking code about mapcount of page, I got confused.
I think mapcount of page is protected by pte lock.
But I can't find pte lock in unmap_and_move.
If I am right, what protects race between this condition check and
rcu_read_lock?
This patch makes race window very small but It can't remove race totally.
I think I am missing something.
Pz, point me out. :)
> + goto uncharge;
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
> rcu_locked = 1;
> anon_vma = page_anon_vma(page);
> --
> 1.6.5
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href