On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > __zone_pcp_update() iterates over NR_CPUS instead of limiting the
> > access to the possible cpus. This might result in access to
> > uninitialized areas as the per cpu allocator only populates the per
> > cpu memory for possible cpus.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -3224,7 +3224,7 @@ static int __zone_pcp_update(void *data)
> > int cpu;
> > unsigned long batch = zone_batchsize(zone), flags;
> >
> > - for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++) {
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > struct per_cpu_pageset *pset;
> > struct per_cpu_pages *pcp;
> >
>
> I'm having trouble working out whether we want to backport this into
> 2.6.33.x or earlier. Help?
Nope. This problem was created as a result of the dynamic allocation of
pagesets from percpu memory that went in during the merge window.
(99dcc3e5a94ed491fbef402831d8c0bbb267f995)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>