Re: [PATCH -mmotm 3/4] memcg: dirty pages accounting and limiting infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 09:18:45 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:31:00 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:07:11 +0900
> > Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Hmm...accepatable ? (sounds it's in error-range)
> > 
> > BTW, why local_irq_disable() ? 
> > local_irq_save()/restore() isn't better ?
> > 
> I don't have any strong reason. All of lock_page_cgroup() is *now* called w/o irq disabled,
> so I used just disable()/enable() instead of save()/restore().

My point is, this will be used under treelock soon.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]