On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:15:49 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Agreed.
> Let's try how we can write a code in clean way. (we have time ;)
> For now, to me, IRQ disabling while lock_page_cgroup() seems to be a little
> over killing. What I really want is lockless code...but it seems impossible
> under current implementation.
>
> I wonder the fact "the page is never unchareged under us" can give us some chances
> ...Hmm.
>
How about this ? Basically, I don't like duplicating information...so,
# of new pcg_flags may be able to be reduced.
I'm glad this can be a hint for Andrea-san.
==
---
include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++-
mm/memcontrol.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: mmotm-2.6.33-Mar2/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.33-Mar2.orig/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
+++ mmotm-2.6.33-Mar2/include/linux/page_cgroup.h
@@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ enum {
PCG_CACHE, /* charged as cache */
PCG_USED, /* this object is in use. */
PCG_ACCT_LRU, /* page has been accounted for */
+ PCG_MIGRATE_LOCK, /* used for mutual execution of account migration */
+ PCG_ACCT_DIRTY,
+ PCG_ACCT_WB,
+ PCG_ACCT_WB_TEMP,
+ PCG_ACCT_UNSTABLE,
};
#define TESTPCGFLAG(uname, lname) \
@@ -73,6 +78,23 @@ CLEARPCGFLAG(AcctLRU, ACCT_LRU)
TESTPCGFLAG(AcctLRU, ACCT_LRU)
TESTCLEARPCGFLAG(AcctLRU, ACCT_LRU)
+SETPCGFLAG(AcctDirty, ACCT_DIRTY);
+CLEARPCGFLAG(AcctDirty, ACCT_DIRTY);
+TESTPCGFLAG(AcctDirty, ACCT_DIRTY);
+
+SETPCGFLAG(AcctWB, ACCT_WB);
+CLEARPCGFLAG(AcctWB, ACCT_WB);
+TESTPCGFLAG(AcctWB, ACCT_WB);
+
+SETPCGFLAG(AcctWBTemp, ACCT_WB_TEMP);
+CLEARPCGFLAG(AcctWBTemp, ACCT_WB_TEMP);
+TESTPCGFLAG(AcctWBTemp, ACCT_WB_TEMP);
+
+SETPCGFLAG(AcctUnstableNFS, ACCT_UNSTABLE);
+CLEARPCGFLAG(AcctUnstableNFS, ACCT_UNSTABLE);
+TESTPCGFLAG(AcctUnstableNFS, ACCT_UNSTABLE);
+
+
static inline int page_cgroup_nid(struct page_cgroup *pc)
{
return page_to_nid(pc->page);
@@ -82,7 +104,9 @@ static inline enum zone_type page_cgroup
{
return page_zonenum(pc->page);
}
-
+/*
+ * lock_page_cgroup() should not be held under mapping->tree_lock
+ */
static inline void lock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc)
{
bit_spin_lock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
@@ -93,6 +117,24 @@ static inline void unlock_page_cgroup(st
bit_spin_unlock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags);
}
+/*
+ * Lock order is
+ * lock_page_cgroup()
+ * lock_page_cgroup_migrate()
+ * This lock is not be lock for charge/uncharge but for account moving.
+ * i.e. overwrite pc->mem_cgroup. The lock owner should guarantee by itself
+ * the page is uncharged while we hold this.
+ */
+static inline void lock_page_cgroup_migrate(struct page_cgroup *pc)
+{
+ bit_spin_lock(PCG_MIGRATE_LOCK, &pc->flags);
+}
+
+static inline void unlock_page_cgroup_migrate(struct page_cgroup *pc)
+{
+ bit_spin_unlock(PCG_MIGRATE_LOCK, &pc->flags);
+}
+
#else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR */
struct page_cgroup;
Index: mmotm-2.6.33-Mar2/mm/memcontrol.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.33-Mar2.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.33-Mar2/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ enum mem_cgroup_stat_index {
MEM_CGROUP_STAT_PGPGOUT_COUNT, /* # of pages paged out */
MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAPOUT, /* # of pages, swapped out */
MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS, /* incremented at every pagein/pageout */
+ MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY,
+ MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WBACK,
+ MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WBACK_TEMP,
+ MEM_CGROUP_STAT_UNSTABLE_NFS,
MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS,
};
@@ -1360,6 +1364,86 @@ done:
}
/*
+ * Update file cache's status for memcg. Before calling this,
+ * mapping->tree_lock should be held and preemption is disabled.
+ * Then, it's guarnteed that the page is not uncharged while we
+ * access page_cgroup. We can make use of that.
+ */
+void mem_cgroup_update_stat_locked(struct page *page, int idx, bool set)
+{
+ struct page_cgroup *pc;
+ struct mem_cgroup *mem;
+
+ pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
+ /* Not accounted ? */
+ if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc))
+ return;
+ lock_page_cgroup_migrate(pc);
+ /*
+ * It's guarnteed that this page is never uncharged.
+ * The only racy problem is moving account among memcgs.
+ */
+ switch (idx) {
+ case MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY:
+ if (set)
+ SetPageCgroupAcctDirty(pc);
+ else
+ ClearPageCgroupAcctDirty(pc);
+ break;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WBACK:
+ if (set)
+ SetPageCgroupAcctWB(pc);
+ else
+ ClearPageCgroupAcctWB(pc);
+ break;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WBACK_TEMP:
+ if (set)
+ SetPageCgroupAcctWBTemp(pc);
+ else
+ ClearPageCgroupAcctWBTemp(pc);
+ break;
+ case MEM_CGROUP_STAT_UNSTABLE_NFS:
+ if (set)
+ SetPageCgroupAcctUnstableNFS(pc);
+ else
+ ClearPageCgroupAcctUnstableNFS(pc);
+ break;
+ default:
+ BUG();
+ break;
+ }
+ mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
+ if (set)
+ __this_cpu_inc(mem->stat->count[idx]);
+ else
+ __this_cpu_dec(mem->stat->count[idx]);
+ unlock_page_cgroup_migrate(pc);
+}
+
+static void move_acct_information(struct mem_cgroup *from,
+ struct mem_cgroup *to,
+ struct page_cgroup *pc)
+{
+ /* preemption is disabled, migration_lock is held. */
+ if (PageCgroupAcctDirty(pc)) {
+ __this_cpu_dec(from->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY]);
+ __this_cpu_inc(to->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_DIRTY]);
+ }
+ if (PageCgroupAcctWB(pc)) {
+ __this_cpu_dec(from->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WBACK]);
+ __this_cpu_inc(to->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WBACK]);
+ }
+ if (PageCgroupAcctWBTemp(pc)) {
+ __this_cpu_dec(from->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WBACK_TEMP]);
+ __this_cpu_inc(to->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_WBACK_TEMP]);
+ }
+ if (PageCgroupAcctUnstableNFS(pc)) {
+ __this_cpu_dec(from->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_UNSTABLE_NFS]);
+ __this_cpu_inc(to->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_UNSTABLE_NFS]);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
* size of first charge trial. "32" comes from vmscan.c's magic value.
* TODO: maybe necessary to use big numbers in big irons.
*/
@@ -1794,15 +1878,16 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(st
VM_BUG_ON(!PageCgroupUsed(pc));
VM_BUG_ON(pc->mem_cgroup != from);
+ preempt_disable();
+ lock_page_cgroup_migrate(pc);
page = pc->page;
if (page_mapped(page) && !PageAnon(page)) {
/* Update mapped_file data for mem_cgroup */
- preempt_disable();
__this_cpu_dec(from->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
__this_cpu_inc(to->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
- preempt_enable();
}
mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(from, pc, false);
+ move_acct_information(from, to, pc);
if (uncharge)
/* This is not "cancel", but cancel_charge does all we need. */
mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(from);
@@ -1810,6 +1895,8 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(st
/* caller should have done css_get */
pc->mem_cgroup = to;
mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(to, pc, true);
+ unlock_page_cgroup_migrate(pc);
+ preempt_enable();
/*
* We charges against "to" which may not have any tasks. Then, "to"
* can be under rmdir(). But in current implementation, caller of
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>