On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:45:02PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Christoph Lameter kirjoitti: >>> kmalloc_node() in generic kernel code. All that is done under >>> MEM_GOING_ONLINE and not MEM_ONLINE, which is why I suggest the first and >>> fourth patch in this series may not be necessary if we prevent setting the >>> bit in the nodemask or building the zonelists until the slab nodelists are >>> ready. >> >> That sounds good. > > Andi? Well if Christoph wants to submit a better patch that is tested and solves the problems he can do that. if he doesn't then I think my patch kit which has been tested is the best alternative currently. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>