Re: Improving OOM killer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/10/2010 03:54 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:

  Simply computing the cost of the whole children subtree (or a reasonable
approximation) avoids the need for any magic numbers and gives a much better
representation of how costly the subtree is, since, well, it is the cost
itself.

That assumes you want to kill off that entire tree.

You will not want to do that when a web server or
database server runs out of memory, because the
goal of the OOM killer is to allow the system to
continue to run and be useful. This means keeping
the services available...

--
All rights reversed.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]