Re: Improving OOM killer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2010 22:39:08 schrieb David Rientjes:
> > If we really want kernel to detect forkbombs (*), we'd have to establish 
> > completely separate infrastructure for that (with its own knobs for tuning 
> > and possibilities of disabling it completely).
> > 
> 
> That's what we're trying to do, we can look at the shear number of 
> children that the parent has forked and check for it to be over a certain 
> "forkbombing threshold" (which, yes, can be tuned from userspace), the 
> uptime of those children, their resident set size, etc., to attempt to 
> find a sane heuristic that penalizes them.

Wouldn't it be saner to have a selection by user, so that users that
are over the overcommit limit are targeted?

	Regards
		Oliver

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]