On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 08:54:31PM +0800, WangYuli wrote:
> Declare which_prom() as static to suppress gcc compiler warning that
> 'missing-prototypes'. This function is not intended to be called
> from other parts.
>
> Fix follow error with gcc-14 when -Werror:
>
> arch/mips/dec/prom/init.c:45:13: error: no previous prototype for ‘which_prom’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> 45 | void __init which_prom(s32 magic, s32 *prom_vec)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[6]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:207: arch/mips/dec/prom/init.o] Error 1
> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:465: arch/mips/dec/prom] Error 2
> make[5]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> Signed-off-by: WangYuli <wangyuli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/mips/dec/prom/init.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/dec/prom/init.c b/arch/mips/dec/prom/init.c
> index cb12eb211a49..8d74d7d6c05b 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/dec/prom/init.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/dec/prom/init.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int (*__pmax_close)(int);
> * Detect which PROM the DECSTATION has, and set the callback vectors
> * appropriately.
> */
> -void __init which_prom(s32 magic, s32 *prom_vec)
> +static void __init which_prom(s32 magic, s32 *prom_vec)
> {
> /*
> * No sign of the REX PROM's magic number means we assume a non-REX
> --
> 2.47.2
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
