Hi,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 9:28 AM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The auxiliary device creation of this driver is simple enough to
> use the available auxiliary device creation helper.
>
> Use it and remove some boilerplate code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 84 +++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
Thanks for creating the helpers and getting rid of some boilerplate!
This conflicts with commit 574f5ee2c85a ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86:
Fix multiple instances") which is in drm-next, though. Please resolve.
Since nothing here is urgent, I would assume patch #1 would land and
then we'd just wait until it made it to mainline before landing the
other patches in their respective trees?
> -static int ti_sn65dsi86_add_aux_device(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata,
> - struct auxiliary_device **aux_out,
> - const char *name)
> -{
> - struct device *dev = pdata->dev;
> - struct auxiliary_device *aux;
> - int ret;
> -
> - aux = kzalloc(sizeof(*aux), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!aux)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - aux->name = name;
> - aux->dev.parent = dev;
> - aux->dev.release = ti_sn65dsi86_aux_device_release;
> - device_set_of_node_from_dev(&aux->dev, dev);
> - ret = auxiliary_device_init(aux);
> - if (ret) {
> - kfree(aux);
> - return ret;
> - }
> - ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ti_sn65dsi86_uninit_aux, aux);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = auxiliary_device_add(aux);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, ti_sn65dsi86_delete_aux, aux);
> - if (!ret)
> - *aux_out = aux;
I notice that your new code has one fewer devm_add_action_or_reset()
than the code here which you're replacing. That means it needs to call
"uninit" explicitly in one extra place. It still seems clean enough,
though, so I don't have any real objections to the way you're doing it
there. ;-)
-Doug
