On Thu, Jan 30, 2025, at 15:46, Ism Hong wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann 於 2025/1/28 清晨5:20 寫道:
>
> Thank you for your explanation, and sorry for the late reply due to the
> Chinese New Year.
>
> From your response, I understand that the preferred solution would be
> to modify uClibc to align the behavior of semctl/shmctl/msgctl with
> glibc and musl by adopting a unified feature test macro. If that is the
> case, I will work on preparing a patch for uClibc accordingly.
Yes, that is correct. I think musl doesn't call the separate
syscalls if the architecture provides the old-style socket() syscall,
so it's not affected either way, but glibc needs the revert.
Arnd
