On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 10:24:29AM +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote: > Hello Thomas, > > On Wed Nov 6, 2024 at 5:03 PM CET, Théo Lebrun wrote: > > Now that clk-eyeq is in the clk-next tree, we can add the small(-ish) > > details required to make the platform work fully. The work is mostly > > about updating devicetrees to rely on the system-controller nodes as > > clock providers. > > [...] > > > - clk: > > [PATCH v2 01/10] dt-bindings: soc: mobileye: set `#clock-cells = <1>` for all compatibles > > [PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: clock: eyeq: add more Mobileye EyeQ5/EyeQ6H clocks > > [PATCH v2 03/10] clk: fixed-factor: add clk_hw_register_fixed_factor_index() function > > [PATCH v2 04/10] clk: eyeq: require clock index with phandle in all cases > > [PATCH v2 05/10] clk: eyeq: add fixed factor clocks infrastructure > > [PATCH v2 06/10] clk: eyeq: add EyeQ5 fixed factor clocks > > [PATCH v2 07/10] clk: eyeq: add EyeQ6H central fixed factor clocks > > [PATCH v2 08/10] clk: eyeq: add EyeQ6H west fixed factor clocks > > > > - MIPS: > > [PATCH v2 09/10] MIPS: mobileye: eyeq5: use OLB as provider for fixed factor clocks > > [PATCH v2 10/10] MIPS: mobileye: eyeq6h: add OLB nodes OLB and remove fixed clocks > > Do you think we can make those two patches go in before the next merge > window? Stephen just accepted the above patches. This makes both MIPS > platforms usable on upstream kernels! I've applied, but not pushed, because this Error: /local/tbogendoerfer/korg/linux/arch/mips/boot/dts/mobileye/eyeq5.dtsi:20.19-20 syntax error FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input treeo My tree misses the new CLK defines. I haven't decided whether I'll ignore that and push it now or put them into a second request vor 6.13. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
