Quoting Théo Lebrun (2024-11-06 08:03:52) > Some compatibles expose a single clock. For those, we used to let them > using `#clock-cells = <0>` (ie <&olb> reference rather than <&olb 0>). > > Switch away from that: enforce a cell for all compatibles. This is more > straight forward, and avoids devicetree changes whenever a compatible > goes from exposing a single clock to multiple ones. Also, dt-bindings > get simpler. > > *This is an ABI break*. Change it while EyeQ5 platform support is at its > infancy, without any user. More clocks might hide in each OLB as some > registers are still unknown. > > Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Applied to clk-next
