On 3. Nov 2024, at 20:29, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Nov 2024, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c b/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c
>> index 8eba5a1ed664..3e4be48bab02 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/proc.c
>> @@ -66,12 +66,12 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>> seq_printf(m, "BogoMIPS\t\t: %u.%02u\n",
>> cpu_data[n].udelay_val / (500000/HZ),
>> (cpu_data[n].udelay_val / (5000/HZ)) % 100);
>> - seq_printf(m, "wait instruction\t: %s\n", cpu_wait ? "yes" : "no");
>> + seq_printf(m, "wait instruction\t: %s\n", str_yes_no(cpu_wait));
>> seq_printf(m, "microsecond timers\t: %s\n",
>> - cpu_has_counter ? "yes" : "no");
>> + str_yes_no(cpu_has_counter));
>> seq_printf(m, "tlb_entries\t\t: %d\n", cpu_data[n].tlbsize);
>> seq_printf(m, "extra interrupt vector\t: %s\n",
>> - cpu_has_divec ? "yes" : "no");
>> + str_yes_no(cpu_has_divec));
>> seq_printf(m, "hardware watchpoint\t: %s",
>> cpu_has_watch ? "yes, " : "no\n");
>> if (cpu_has_watch) {
>
> I like this cleanup, but now that it matters I suggest restructuring code
> such that the latter `seq_printf' is converted as well.
What about the comma and newline? Using str_yes_no() would remove them.
Thanks,
Thorsten
