On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Chris Packham wrote: > Add device tree schema for the Realtek RTL9300 switches. The RTL9300 > family is made up of the RTL9301, RTL9302B, RTL9302C and RTL9303. These > have the same SoC differ in the Ethernet switch/SERDES arrangement. > > Currently the only supported features are the syscon-reboot and i2c > controllers. The syscon-reboot is needed to be able to reboot the board. > The I2C controllers are slightly unusual because they each own an SCL > pin (GPIO8 for the first controller, GPIO 17 for the second) but have 8 > common SDA pins which can be assigned to either controller (but not > both). > > Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Notes: > Changes in v7: > - Set additionalProperties: false > - Remove extraneous examples from i2c binding > Changes in v6: > - Drop wildcard compatible > - Add specific compatibles for the 4 known SoC variants > - For the i2c part of the binding accept realtek,rtl9301 as a fallback > for the other compatibles > - The overall switches will eventually differ because these will have > different SERDES/port arrangements so they aren't getting the same > fallback treatment > Changes in v5: > I've combined the two series I had in flight so this is the > combination of adding the switch syscon, the reboot and i2c. It makes > the changelog a bit meaningless so I've dropped the earlier > commentary. > > As requested I've put a more complete example in the main > rtl9300-switch.yaml. > > I've kept rtl9300-i2c.yaml separate for now but link to it with a $ref > from rtl9300-switch.yaml to reduce clutter. The example in > rtl9300-i2c.yaml is technically duplicating part of the example from > rtl9300-switch.yaml but I feel it's nice to be able to see the example > next to where the properties are defined. > > .../bindings/i2c/realtek,rtl9301-i2c.yaml | 69 +++++++++++ > .../bindings/mfd/realtek,rtl9301-switch.yaml | 114 ++++++++++++++++++ Can you separate these out so I can apply the MFD part please? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
