On Tue, 06 Aug 2024 00:26:54 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 11:26:03PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > [+cc Fuad]
>
> Take 2!
>
> > Fuad, you mentioned in commit 9c30fc615daa ("KVM: arm64: Move setting
> > the page as dirty out of the critical section") that restructuring
> > around the MMU lock was helpful for reuse (presumably for pKVM), but I
> > lack the context there.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 04:52:03PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > Mark pages/folios accessed+dirty prior to dropping mmu_lock, as marking a
> > > page/folio dirty after it has been written back can make some filesystems
> > > unhappy (backing KVM guests will such filesystem files is uncommon, and
> >
> > typo: s/will/with/
> >
> > > the race is minuscule, hence the lack of complaints). See the link below
> > > for details.
Should we consider reverting 9c30fc615daa then?
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
