On 26/06/24 19:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 24/06/2024 07:00, Chris Packham wrote: >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> On 24/06/24 16:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 24/06/2024 03:22, Chris Packham wrote: >>>> Add the rtl930x-soc and RTL9302C board to the list of Realtek compatible >>> 930x or 9302? >> Oops. Will fix. >> >>>> strings. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Notes: >>>> Changes in v2: >>>> - Use specific compatible for rtl9302-soc >>>> - Fix to allow correct board, soc compatible >>>> >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/realtek-rtl.yaml | 4 ++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/realtek-rtl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/realtek-rtl.yaml >>>> index f8ac309d2994..05daa53417e5 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/realtek-rtl.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/realtek-rtl.yaml >>>> @@ -20,5 +20,9 @@ properties: >>>> - enum: >>>> - cisco,sg220-26 >>>> - const: realtek,rtl8382-soc >>>> + - items: >>>> + - enum: >>>> + - realtek,rtl9302c >>> Why board has the name of SoC? >> What I have is actually a reference board with the name >> RTL9302C_2xRTL8224_2XGE. If found that a bit incomprehensible so I >> (over) shortened it. Technically it would be something like >> cameo,rtl9302c-2x-rtl8224-2xge which I can include in the next round. > Looks fine to me. > >>>> + - const: realtek,rtl9302-soc >>> Drop the -soc suffix. The rtl9302 is the soc. >> On that. I hope to eventually add "realtek,rtl9302-switch" for the DSA >> switch block in the same chip. So keeping the -soc suffix was >> intentional to try to disambiguate things. I can drop the -soc if the >> consensus is that there is no need to disambiguate the two. > Thanks for explanation, kind of depends on what exactly is this. Most of > SoCs comprise of several items. The entire chip is the soc, e.g. > "qcom,foo1234". It might have MAC/Ethernet/whatever inside, controllable > by the SoC (Linux, bootloader, TF, hypervisor, other VM guest) and that > part is "qcom,foo1234-ethernet". Regardless whether Linux OS actually > controls it or not. > > The question is whether DSA switch is part of the SoC or not. The RTL9302C is a single package but I'd assume internally it has multiple dies. From the block diagram in the datasheet they do have a portion they call the "SoC" which has the CPU and peripherals like UARTs, GPIOs, SPI etc. That is separate from the switch block which has a bunch of MACs, SERDES and various network switch tables. So based on that "realtek,rtl9302-soc" and "realtek,rtl9302-switch" as two separate things make sense to me. I'm still trying to figure out a bit more of the details. The block diagram looks a lot like you'd expect to see with a traditional DSA switch where you have a SoC Ethernet NIC/MAC connected to one port of a switch. But getting into the datasheet it looks like what they call the NIC is actually just the DMA portion of the switch as the registers are all in that second block. As is the MDIO interface. I'm considering that maybe the DSA model isn't right for this and I should be looking at switchdev instead. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
