On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 03:03:48PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > From: Daniel González Cabanelas <dgcbueu@xxxxxxxxx> > > The data RAC is left disabled by the bootloader in some SoCs, at least in > the core it boots from. > Enabling this feature increases the performance up to +30% depending on the > task. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel González Cabanelas <dgcbueu@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@xxxxxxxxx> > [ rework code and reduce code duplication ] > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/mips/kernel/smp-bmips.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/smp-bmips.c b/arch/mips/kernel/smp-bmips.c > index 20e2fb10022d..52324738cbb3 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/smp-bmips.c > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/smp-bmips.c > @@ -626,6 +626,23 @@ void bmips_cpu_setup(void) > __raw_readl(cbr + BMIPS_RAC_ADDRESS_RANGE); > break; > > + case CPU_BMIPS4350: > + u32 rac_addr = BMIPS_RAC_CONFIG_1; my gcc 10.2.1 doesn't like the declaration here: /local/tbogendoerfer/korg/linux/arch/mips/kernel/smp-bmips.c:630:3: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement 630 | u32 rac_addr = BMIPS_RAC_CONFIG_1; Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
