在2024年5月27日五月 下午4:51，Thomas Gleixner写道：
> Jiaxun!
>
Hi Thomas,
[...]
>
> What's this indirection for? Why dont you update
[...]
>
>> +static struct clocksource nodecnt_clocksource = {
>> + .name = "nodecnt",
>> + .read = nodecnt_clocksource_read,
>
> the read function pointer here and spare the indirection?
Smart! sched_clock takes slightly different function pointer argument type
but as we don't use the argument anyway, it should be safe to relax this
indirection.
Will fix in v3.
Thanks
>
> Thanks
>
> tglx
--
- Jiaxun
