On 2024-05-10 16:21, Mina Almasry wrote:
> +void net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf(struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding)
> +{
> + struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq;
> + unsigned long xa_idx;
> + unsigned int rxq_idx;
> +
> + if (!binding)
> + return;
> +
> + if (binding->list.next)
> + list_del(&binding->list);
> +
> + xa_for_each(&binding->bound_rxq_list, xa_idx, rxq) {
> + if (rxq->mp_params.mp_priv == binding) {
> + /* We hold the rtnl_lock while binding/unbinding
> + * dma-buf, so we can't race with another thread that
> + * is also modifying this value. However, the page_pool
> + * may read this config while it's creating its
> + * rx-queues. WRITE_ONCE() here to match the
> + * READ_ONCE() in the page_pool.
> + */
> + WRITE_ONCE(rxq->mp_params.mp_ops, NULL);
> + WRITE_ONCE(rxq->mp_params.mp_priv, NULL);
> +
> + rxq_idx = get_netdev_rx_queue_index(rxq);
> +
> + netdev_rx_queue_restart(binding->dev, rxq_idx);
What if netdev_rx_queue_restart() fails? Depending on where it failed, a
queue might still be filled from struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding. This
is one downside of the current situation with netdev_rx_queue_restart()
needing to do allocations each time.
Perhaps a full reset if individual queue restart fails?
