Hi Conor, conor@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, 13 May 2024 08:59:34 +0100: > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 09:55:04AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > > > robh@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Fri, 10 May 2024 07:30:14 -0500: > > > > > Add another batch of various "simple" syscon compatibles which were > > > undocumented or still documented with old text bindings. Remove the old > > > text binding docs for the ones which were documented. > > > > ... > > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 9 ------ > > > > I don't know how useful are these compatibles, but if I take the case > > of atmel,sama5d3-nfc-io, it is only described in this file, while > > several DTSI reference it. After this change they will no longer be > > referenced at all but still in use. Is this intended? Shall these > > compatibles be totally dropped from the device trees as well? > > > > $ git grep -c atmel,sama5d3-nfc-io arch/ > > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama5d2.dtsi:1 > > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama5d3.dtsi:1 > > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama5d4.dtsi:1 > > arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama7g5.dtsi:1 > > atmel,sama5d3-nfc-io is added to the syscon yaml binding in this patch, > so it's a move not a removal, no? Ah sorry, I missed the additions in this file, fine then, sorry for the misunderstanding. Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> # mtd Thanks, Miquèl