Re: [PATCH 00/14] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: improve DTS style

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-03-17 17:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 16/03/2024 16:49, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 5:54 AM Justin Swartz
<justin.swartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This set of patches was created with the intention of cleaning up
arch/mips/boot/dts/ralink/mt7621.dtsi so that it is aligned with
the Devicetree Sources (DTS) Coding Style [1] [2] guide.

[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst

[2] https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.html

Justin Swartz (14):
  mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder cpu node attributes
  mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder cpuintc node attributes
  mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder mmc regulator attributes
  mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder sysc node attributes
  mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder gpio node attributes
  mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder i2c node attributes
  mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder spi0 node attributes
  mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: move pinctrl and sort its children
  mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder mmc node attributes
  mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder gic node attributes
mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder ethernet node attributes and kids mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder pcie node attributes and children
  mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: reorder pci?_phy attributes

These are all simple cleanups for the same file. It's one patch, not 15.

I agree these are all simple cleanups.

Even though the cleanup pattern was the same, or very similar,
for each node affected, the intention was to isolate each change
to a single node (or a grouping of nodes of that seemed logical
to me) so that if anyone had any objections, the discussion would
be easier to follow in subthreads identifiable by patch names (and
thus subject lines) that clearly indicate the context.

But if there're no objections and it lessens the burden on
maintainers upstream to have less patches to apply, then I have no
problem combining them into a single patch.

Regards
Justin




[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux