[PATCH v4 03/18] dt-bindings: pinctrl: allow pin controller device without unit address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Allow a pin controller device to have no address, therefore no unit

The previous $nodename was enforcing a unit address, but
scripts/dtc/checks.c enforced that names with unit addresses have reg
or ranges:

   Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): .../pinctrl@0: node has a unit
   name, but no reg or ranges property

Fix pinctrl.yaml to adopt a (pinctrl|pinmux)(-[a-z]+)? node name when
neither reg nor ranges are required. Use [a-z]+ to avoid conflicts with

Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl.yaml | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl.yaml
index d471563119a9..3d977b54e260 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl.yaml
@@ -26,9 +26,6 @@ description: |
   controller device.
-  $nodename:
-    pattern: "^(pinctrl|pinmux)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$"
     description: >
       Number of pin control cells in addition to the index within the pin
@@ -42,4 +39,19 @@ properties:
       This property can be set either globally for the pin controller or in
       child nodes for individual pin group control.
+  anyOf:
+    - required:
+        - reg
+    - required:
+        - ranges
+  properties:
+    $nodename:
+      pattern: "^(pinctrl|pinmux)(@[0-9a-f]+)?$"
+  properties:
+    $nodename:
+      pattern: "^(pinctrl|pinmux)(-[a-z]+)?$"
 additionalProperties: true


[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux