* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [240118 08:57]:
> * Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx> [240117 15:52]:
> > On 1/10/24 2:29 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx> [240109 17:20]:
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/dra7.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/dra7.dtsi
> > > > @@ -850,12 +850,19 @@ target-module@56000000 {
> > > > <SYSC_IDLE_SMART>;
> > > > ti,sysc-sidle = <SYSC_IDLE_FORCE>,
> > > > <SYSC_IDLE_NO>,
> > > > - <SYSC_IDLE_SMART>;
> > > > + <SYSC_IDLE_SMART>,
> > > > + <SYSC_IDLE_SMART_WKUP>;
> > >
> > > You probably checked this already.. But just in case, can you please
> > > confirm this is intentional. The documentation lists the smart wakeup
> > > capability bit as reserved for dra7, maybe the documentation is wrong.
> > >
> >
> > It was an intentional change, although I'm not sure it is correct :)
> >
> > This is how we had it in our "evil vendor tree" for years (back when it
> > was hwmod based), so when converting these nodes to use "ti,sysc" I noticed
> > this bit was set, but as you point out the documentation disagrees.
> >
> > I'd rather go with what has worked before, but it doesn't seem to
> > break anything either way, so we could also break this change out into
> > its own patch if you would prefer.
>
> I agree it's best to stick what is known to work. How about let's add
> the related information to the patch description?
I'll update the commit message for it and apply these, no need to repost.
Regards,
Tony
