On 09/01/2024 20:04, Andrew Davis wrote: > On 1/9/24 12:59 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 09/01/2024 18:19, Andrew Davis wrote: >>> This binding will be used for GPUs starting from Series6 (Rogue) >>> and later. A different binding document will describe Series5. >>> With that the name "img,powervr" is too generic, rename to >>> "img,powervr-rogue" to avoid confusion. >>> >>> Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Frank Binns <frank.binns@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> Why do you send new version while we still talk about previous? >> >> Please implement feedback from v1 (and this is v2, so next is v3) or >> keep discussing. >> > > I agreed with everything you said in the last round (RFC v2) and > made all requested changes. Did I miss something in this version? The recommendation is that naming of the file matches generic compatible and your file has only one generic compatible. Therefore I don't understand why you claimed there are multiple compatibles. Best regards, Krzysztof
