On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:33:47PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:01:07 +0000, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 03:45:22PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Only present the DWMAC_LOONGSON option on architectures where it can > > > actually be used. > > > > > > This follows the same logic as the DWMAC_INTEL option. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > I'm not familiar with the hardware, so please let me know if the > > > dependency needs to be adjusted somehow. > > > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > --- linux-6.6.orig/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig > > > +++ linux-6.6/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig > > > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ config DWMAC_INTEL > > > config DWMAC_LOONGSON > > > tristate "Loongson PCI DWMAC support" > > > default MACH_LOONGSON64 > > > - depends on STMMAC_ETH && PCI > > > + depends on MACH_LOONGSON64 && STMMAC_ETH && PCI > > > > Could we consider also allowing the build to occur if COMPILE_TEST is set? > > This would maintain the current level of build test coverage. > > > > Something line this (completely untested!): > > > > depends on (MACH_LOONGSON64 || COMPILE_TEST) && STMMAC_ETH && PCI > > Sure, that would be totally fine with me. Thanks, I think that if no one objects within the next day or so then posting a v2 would be a good next step.
