Re: [PATCH 31/34] KVM: selftests: Expand set_memory_region_test to validate guest_memfd()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/5/23 17:30, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Expand set_memory_region_test to exercise various positive and negative
testcases for private memory.

  - Non-guest_memfd() file descriptor for private memory
  - guest_memfd() from different VM
  - Overlapping bindings
  - Unaligned bindings

This needs a small fixup:

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h
index e4d2cd9218b2..1b58f943562f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h
@@ -819,6 +819,7 @@ static inline struct kvm_vm *vm_create_barebones(void)
 	return ____vm_create(VM_SHAPE_DEFAULT);
 }
+#ifdef __x86_64__
 static inline struct kvm_vm *vm_create_barebones_protected_vm(void)
 {
 	const struct vm_shape shape = {
@@ -828,6 +829,7 @@ static inline struct kvm_vm *vm_create_barebones_protected_vm(void)
return ____vm_create(shape);
 }
+#endif
static inline struct kvm_vm *vm_create(uint32_t nr_runnable_vcpus)
 {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
index 1891774eb6d4..302c7a46955b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c
@@ -386,6 +386,7 @@ static void test_add_max_memory_regions(void)
 }
+#ifdef __x86_64__
 static void test_invalid_guest_memfd(struct kvm_vm *vm, int memfd,
 				     size_t offset, const char *msg)
 {
@@ -476,14 +477,13 @@ static void test_add_overlapping_private_memory_regions(void)
 	close(memfd);
 	kvm_vm_free(vm);
 }
+#endif
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
 #ifdef __x86_64__
 	int i, loops;
-#endif
-#ifdef __x86_64__
 	/*
 	 * FIXME: the zero-memslot test fails on aarch64 and s390x because
 	 * KVM_RUN fails with ENOEXEC or EFAULT.
@@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
test_add_max_memory_regions(); +#ifdef __x86_64__
 	if (kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD) &&
 	    (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM))) {
 		test_add_private_memory_region();
@@ -501,7 +502,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 		pr_info("Skipping tests for KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD memory regions\n");
 	}
-#ifdef __x86_64__
 	if (argc > 1)
 		loops = atoi_positive("Number of iterations", argv[1]);
 	else

in order to compile successfully on non-x86 platforms.




[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux