Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: loongson,liointc: Fix dtbs_check for interrupt-names

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 10:36:38AM +0800, Binbin Zhou wrote:
> The Loongson-2K0500/2K1000 CPUs have 64 interrupt sources as inputs, and
> a route-mapped node handles up to 32 interrupt sources, so two liointc
> nodes are defined in dts{i}.
> Of course, we need to ensure that the routing outputs (intx) of the two
> nodes cannot conflict.
> 
> For example, in Loongson-2K1000, 'int0' is typically used by the liointc0
> node, then the liointc1 node can only use the outputs starting with
> 'int1'.
> 
> So "interrupt-names" should be defined by "pattern".
> 
> This fixes dtbs_check warning:
> 
> DTC_CHK arch/loongarch/boot/dts/loongson-2k0500-ref.dtb
> arch/loongarch/boot/dts/loongson-2k0500-ref.dtb: interrupt-controller@1fe11440: interrupt-names:0: 'int0' was expected
>         From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,liointc.yaml
> arch/loongarch/boot/dts/loongson-2k0500-ref.dtb: interrupt-controller@1fe11440: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('interrupt-names' was unexpected)
>         From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,liointc.yaml
> DTC_CHK arch/loongarch/boot/dts/loongson-2k1000-ref.dtb
> arch/loongarch/boot/dts/loongson-2k1000-ref.dtb: interrupt-controller@1fe01440: interrupt-names:0: 'int0' was expected
>         From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,liointc.yaml
> arch/loongarch/boot/dts/loongson-2k1000-ref.dtb: interrupt-controller@1fe01440: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('interrupt-names' was unexpected)
>         From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,liointc.yaml
> 
> Signed-off-by: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,liointc.yaml    | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,liointc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,liointc.yaml
> index 7393d7dfbe82..a90c609d351e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,liointc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/loongson,liointc.yaml
> @@ -54,11 +54,9 @@ properties:
>    interrupt-names:
>      description: List of names for the parent interrupts.
>      items:
> -      - const: int0
> -      - const: int1
> -      - const: int2
> -      - const: int3
> +      pattern: int[0-3]
>      minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 4
>  
>    '#interrupt-cells':
>      const: 2
> @@ -87,6 +85,7 @@ required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
>    - interrupts
> +  - interrupt-names

A new required property is an ABI break. Is that okay for this platform? 
The commit msg should answer that if so.


>    - interrupt-controller
>    - '#interrupt-cells'
>    - loongson,parent-int-map
> -- 
> 2.39.3
> 



[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux