On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, at 17:32, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:48:03PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, at 16:51, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>> >>> I don't see any good solution, they changed their name and >>> ownership too many times. I would actually revert back the >>> description here to "MIPS Technologies Inc" instead of trying >>> to keep track of what they currently call themselves. >>> >>> Since we already have both the 'mips,' and 'mti,' vendow >>> names for the 14Kc, 14KEc and 24KEc parts, maybe we can >>> just go back to 'mips,' for all cores past the mti era >>> rather than trying to date and geolocate each of the >>> classic cores as one of 'mti', 'img', 'wavecomp', 'tallwood', >>> 'mips' 'cipunited' etc. >> >> I would reserve 'mips' for anything common. Much like 'riscv' is only >> for things based on RiscV specs/standards. >> >> I would use 'img' here if we know this was designed/implemented by >> Imagination. > > If there is no objection I will use 'img' then. Ok, let's do that then. With this modification: Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
