On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:18 -0700, Sohil Mehta wrote: > > If you like, I can pick this up for 6.7 through the asm-generic > > tree. If you think this should be part of 6.6, I would suggest > > to merge it through the tree that originally contained the > > syscall code. > > > > Dave, Ingo, would you prefer to take this patch through 6.6 or defer > it > until 6.7? > > It's not necessarily a fix but it does help finish up the shstk > syscall > added with 6.6. Also, it might help reduce some merge conflicts later > if > newer syscalls are being added during the 6.7 window. Hi Arnd, It doesn't look like anyone is pouncing on the syscall number in linux- next currently. It might be nice to have this patch go through linux- next since it touches so many architectures. And it sounds like x86 folk are ok with this, so if you could pick it up for 6.7 that would be great. Thanks!
