Hi Bartosz,
brgl@xxxxxxxx wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:06:23 +0200:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We have a special place for OF polarity quirks in gpiolib-of.c. Let's
> move this over there so that it doesn't pollute the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This is an alternative to the previous patch that instead of replacing
> one active-low setter with another, just moves the quirk over to
> gpiolib-of.c
>
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/ingenic/ingenic_nand_drv.c | 12 ------------
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> index 5515f32cf19b..58c0bbe9d569 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -192,6 +192,15 @@ static void of_gpio_try_fixup_polarity(const struct device_node *np,
> */
> { "himax,hx8357", "gpios-reset", false },
> { "himax,hx8369", "gpios-reset", false },
> + /*
> + * The rb-gpios semantics was undocumented and qi,lb60 (along with
> + * the ingenic driver) got it wrong. The active state encodes the
> + * NAND ready state, which is high level. Since there's no signal
> + * inverter on this board, it should be active-high. Let's fix that
> + * here for older DTs so we can re-use the generic nand_gpio_waitrdy()
> + * helper, and be consistent with what other drivers do.
> + */
> + { "qi,lb60", "rb-gpios", true },
I didn't know about such a list, interesting. Better be aware when
debugging :)
IIRC Linus was fine, so if Paul also agrees I guess this is better
taking through the gpio tree? I don't have any ingenic related changes
queued right now so feel free to take it.
Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Miquèl
