Hi, On 9/13/23 13:50, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Use the new polarity setter instead of the more cumbersome toggle > function. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/clk_and_regulator.c | 2 +- > drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/led.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/clk_and_regulator.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/clk_and_regulator.c > index ef4b3141efcd..31e520838b95 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/clk_and_regulator.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/clk_and_regulator.c > @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ int skl_int3472_register_gpio_clock(struct int3472_discrete_device *int3472, > } > > if (polarity == GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) > - gpiod_toggle_active_low(int3472->clock.ena_gpio); > + gpiod_set_active_low(int3472->clock.ena_gpio); > > /* Ensure the pin is in output mode and non-active state */ > gpiod_direction_output(int3472->clock.ena_gpio, 0); > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/led.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/led.c > index bca1ce7d0d0c..46c9c569df5e 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/led.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/led.c > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ int skl_int3472_register_pled(struct int3472_discrete_device *int3472, > "getting privacy LED GPIO\n"); > > if (polarity == GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) > - gpiod_toggle_active_low(int3472->pled.gpio); > + gpiod_set_active_low(int3472->pled.gpio); > > /* Ensure the pin is in output mode and non-active state */ > gpiod_direction_output(int3472->pled.gpio, 0); Thanks. I agree that the new API is much better: Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> Feel free to merge this through the GPIO tree. Regards, Hans
