Hi, Thomas, On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 11:44 PM Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:11:19AM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 04:36:19PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > > > v4: > > > -- Add BUG() at the end of nmi_exception_handler() > > > -- Return earlier in die() if notify_die() returns NOTIFY_STOP > > > -- Update the patch titles and commit messages > > > > > > v3: > > > -- Make each patch can be built without errors and warnings. > > > > > > v2: > > > -- Update the commit message to give more detailed info, split into > > > three individual patches, suggested by Maciej, thank you. > > > > > > Tiezhu Yang (4): > > > MIPS: Add BUG() at the end of nmi_exception_handler() > > > MIPS: Do not kill the task in die() if notify_die() returns > > > NOTIFY_STOP > > > MIPS: Return earlier in die() if notify_die() returns NOTIFY_STOP > > > MIPS: Add identifier names to arguments of die() declaration > > > > > > arch/mips/include/asm/ptrace.h | 2 +- > > > arch/mips/kernel/traps.c | 15 +++++++++------ > > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > series applied to mips-next. > > I've dropped the series again after feedback from Maciej, that this > still needs more changes. I feel a little surprised. This series has appeared for more than ten days and received some R-b, and we haven't seen any objections from Maciej. If there are really some bugs that need to be fixed, I think the normal operation is making additional patches... Huacai > > Thomas. > > -- > Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a > good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
