On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 02:36:25AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote: > On 2023-07-11, Alexey Gladkov <legion@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On the userspace side fchmodat(3) is implemented as a wrapper > > function which implements the POSIX-specified interface. This > > interface differs from the underlying kernel system call, which does not > > have a flags argument. Most implementations require procfs [1][2]. > > > > There doesn't appear to be a good userspace workaround for this issue > > but the implementation in the kernel is pretty straight-forward. > > > > The new fchmodat2() syscall allows to pass the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, > > unlike existing fchmodat. > > > > [1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/fchmodat.c;h=17eca54051ee28ba1ec3f9aed170a62630959143;hb=a492b1e5ef7ab50c6fdd4e4e9879ea5569ab0a6c#l35 > > [2] https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/stat/fchmodat.c?id=718f363bc2067b6487900eddc9180c84e7739f80#n28 > > > > Co-developed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <legion@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/open.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- > > include/linux/syscalls.h | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c > > index 0c55c8e7f837..39a7939f0d00 100644 > > --- a/fs/open.c > > +++ b/fs/open.c > > @@ -671,11 +671,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(fchmod, unsigned int, fd, umode_t, mode) > > return err; > > } > > > > -static int do_fchmodat(int dfd, const char __user *filename, umode_t mode) > > +static int do_fchmodat(int dfd, const char __user *filename, umode_t mode, int lookup_flags) > > I think it'd be much neater to do the conversion of AT_ flags here and > pass 0 as a flags argument for all of the wrappers (this is how most of > the other xyz(), fxyz(), fxyzat() syscall wrappers are done IIRC). I just addressed the Al Viro's suggestion. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190717014802.GS17978@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > { > > struct path path; > > int error; > > - unsigned int lookup_flags = LOOKUP_FOLLOW; > > + > > retry: > > error = user_path_at(dfd, filename, lookup_flags, &path); > > if (!error) { > > @@ -689,15 +689,25 @@ static int do_fchmodat(int dfd, const char __user *filename, umode_t mode) > > return error; > > } > > > > +SYSCALL_DEFINE4(fchmodat2, int, dfd, const char __user *, filename, > > + umode_t, mode, int, flags) > > +{ > > + if (unlikely(flags & ~AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > We almost certainly want to support AT_EMPTY_PATH at the same time. > Otherwise userspace will still need to go through /proc when trying to > chmod a file handle they have. I'm not sure I understand. Can you explain what you mean? -- Rgrds, legion
