On 18/7/23 15:44, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
There are some __iomem type casting being missed in previous patch.
Fix them here.
Fixes: 5bd3990723bd ("MIPS: Loongson64: Prefix ipi register address pointers with __iomem")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307020639.QCZOKp8B-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/mips/loongson64/smp.c | 168 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
static void ipi_mailbox_buf_init(void)
{
- ipi_mailbox_buf[0] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[0] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP0_BASE + SMP_CORE0_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[1] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[1] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP0_BASE + SMP_CORE1_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[2] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[2] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP0_BASE + SMP_CORE2_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[3] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[3] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP0_BASE + SMP_CORE3_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[4] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[4] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP1_BASE + SMP_CORE0_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[5] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[5] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP1_BASE + SMP_CORE1_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[6] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[6] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP1_BASE + SMP_CORE2_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[7] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[7] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP1_BASE + SMP_CORE3_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[8] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[8] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP2_BASE + SMP_CORE0_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[9] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[9] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP2_BASE + SMP_CORE1_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[10] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[10] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP2_BASE + SMP_CORE2_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[11] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[11] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP2_BASE + SMP_CORE3_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[12] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[12] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP3_BASE + SMP_CORE0_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[13] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[13] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP3_BASE + SMP_CORE1_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[14] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[14] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP3_BASE + SMP_CORE2_OFFSET + BUF);
- ipi_mailbox_buf[15] = (void *)
+ ipi_mailbox_buf[15] = (void __iomem *)
(SMP_CORE_GROUP3_BASE + SMP_CORE3_OFFSET + BUF);
}
OK up to here,
@@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ void play_dead(void)
if (prid_imp == PRID_IMP_LOONGSON_64G) {
play_dead_at_ckseg1 =
- (void *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type3_play_dead);
+ (void __iomem *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type3_play_dead);
but these changes look dubious.
goto out;
}
@@ -790,19 +790,19 @@ void play_dead(void)
case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3A_R1:
default:
play_dead_at_ckseg1 =
- (void *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type1_play_dead);
+ (void __iomem *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type1_play_dead);
break;
case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3B_R1:
case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3B_R2:
play_dead_at_ckseg1 =
- (void *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type2_play_dead);
+ (void __iomem *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type2_play_dead);
break;
case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3A_R2_0:
case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3A_R2_1:
case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3A_R3_0:
case PRID_REV_LOONGSON3A_R3_1:
play_dead_at_ckseg1 =
- (void *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type3_play_dead);
+ (void __iomem *)CKSEG1ADDR((unsigned long)loongson3_type3_play_dead);
break;
}
