On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 06:13:41AM +0200, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > Hi Liviu, Hi Sergio, > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 7:56 PM Liviu Dudau <liviu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Arınç, > > > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 02:59:44PM +0200, Arınç ÜNAL wrote: > > > On 9.05.2023 22:00, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > > > The device tree uses numbers as arguments to the phys property that are > > > > confusing for newcomers. Define names for the values and use them in the > > > > device tree. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > You should document this on > > > instead of > > > doing this. Under the phys property, add 'description:' and explain this. > > > > There is already some sort of explanation under > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/mediatek,mt7621-pci-phy.yaml, so I'm > > not sure what I'm improving by adding new text in the /pci/ section. > > > > Maybe I haven't explained properly in the commit message, this is meant to > > give a name to the 1 and 0 values used in the device tree, not to clarify > > any perceived missing documentation. > > What is that useful for if the bindings are well documented? The > description in the > 'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/mediatek,mt7621-pcie.yaml' file > for the '#phy-cells' > property is already telling you what that cell is used for. It is > obvious that zero means not dual ported and one means dual ported. > So for me there is no need to add anything extra but in case you want > to clarify anything you should modify binding documentation not the > device tree file at all. Understood. Then please feel free to ignore this patch. Best regards, Liviu > > Thanks, > Sergio Paracuellos > > > > > > > > Arınç > > > > Best regards, > > Liviu -- Everyone who uses computers frequently has had, from time to time, a mad desire to attack the precocious abacus with an axe. -- John D. Clark, Ignition!