On Tue, May 09 2023 at 12:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:43:47PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> - /* >> - * Sync point with wait_cpu_callin(). The AP doesn't wait here >> - * but just sets the bit to let the controlling CPU (BSP) know that >> - * it's got this far. >> - */ >> smp_callin(); >> >> /* Otherwise gcc will move up smp_processor_id() before cpu_init() */ > > Good riddance to that mask; however is smp_callin() still an appropriate > name for that function? > > Would smp_starting() -- seeing how this kicks of CPU_STARTING not be a > better name? Something like that, yes.
