On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 11:05:45AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> In commit 6e30a66433af ("driver core: class: remove struct module owner
> out of struct class"), the module owner pointer was removed from struct
> class, but this was missed for the mips vpe-cmp code due to lack of
> build testing (and it being burried under a very unused config
> settings.) Fix this up by removing the module pointer to resolve the
> build error.
>
> Note, there are other problems with the driver model usage in this file
> (static struct device usage, empty device release function, etc.), so it
> probably could use some good cleaning up, but odds are this driver
> really isn't used so hopefully it will just be removed entirely someday
> soon as part of the general "remove unused arches" cleanup that is
> slowly happening.
>
> Cc: Dengcheng Zhu <dzhu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Qais Yousef <Qais.Yousef@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steven J. Hill <Steven.Hill@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304020802.xbRTJKjW-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> Fixes: 6e30a66433af ("driver core: class: remove struct module owner out of struct class")
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/vpe-cmp.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe-cmp.c b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe-cmp.c
> index 92140edb3ce3..4ef7f49a4c6d 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe-cmp.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/vpe-cmp.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ static void vpe_device_release(struct device *cd)
>
> static struct class vpe_class = {
> .name = "vpe",
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .dev_release = vpe_device_release,
> .dev_groups = vpe_groups,
> };
> --
> 2.40.0
I guess this should go the same way as commit 6e30a66433af, therefore
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
